Najlepsze legalne aplikacje hazardowe w Polsce 2026 – Ranking i opinie eksperta
  • SOFTWARE
    • DATABASES
      • REPAIRtoire

        • REPAIRtoire is an online database for systems biology of DNA damage and repair. The database collects and organizes the following types of information: (i) DNA damage linked to environmental mutagenic and cytotoxic agents, (ii) pathways comprising individual processes and enzymatic reactions involved in the removal of damage, (iii) proteins participating in DNA repair and (iv) diseases correlated with mutations in genes encoding DNA repair proteins. The DNA repair and tolerance pathways are represented as graphs and in tabular form with descriptions of each repair step and corresponding proteins, and individual entries are cross-referenced to supporting literature and primary databases. In addition, a tool for drawing custom DNA-protein complexes is available online.

      • MODOMICS

        • MODOMICS is the first comprehesive database system for systems biology of RNA modification. It integrates information about the chemical structure of modified nucleosides, their localization in RNA sequences, pathways of their biosynthesis and enzymes that carry out the respective reactions (including the available protein sequence and structure data). It also provides literature information, and links to other databases. The database can be queried by the type of nucleoside (e.g. A, G, C, U, I, m1A, nm5s2U etc.), type of RNA, position of a particular nucleoside, type of reaction (e.g. methylation, thiolation, deamination, etc.), and name or sequence of an enzyme of interest. Options for data presentation include graphs of pathways involving the query nucleoside, multiple sequence alignments of RNA sequences and tabular forms with enzyme and literatiure data. The contents of MODOMICS can be accessed through the World Wide Web at http://genesilico.pl/modomics/

      • RNA Bricks

        • RNA Bricks is a database of RNA 3D structure motifs and their contacts, both with themselves and with proteins. The database provides structure-quality score annotations and tools for the RNA 3D structure search and comparison. 

      • RNArchitecture

        • RNArchitecture is a database that provides a comprehensive description of relationships between known families of structured non-coding RNAs, with a focus on structural similarities. The classification is hierarchical and similar to the system used in the SCOP and CATH databases of protein structures. Its central level is Family, which builds on the Rfam catalog, and gathers closely related RNAs. Consensus structures of Families are described with a reduced secondary structure representation. Evolutionarily related Families are grouped into Superfamilies. Similar structures are further grouped into Architectures. The highest level, Class, organizes Families into very broad structural categories, such as simple or complex structured RNAs. Some groups at different levels of the hierarchy are currently labeled as “unclassified”. For each Family with an experimentally determined 3D structure(s), a representative one is provided. RNArchitecture also presents theoretical models of RNA 3D structure and is open for submission of structural models by users. Compared to other databases, RNArchitecture is unique in its focus on structure-based RNA classification, and in providing a platform for storing RNA 3D structure predictions. RNArchitecture can be accessed at http://iimcb.genesilico.pl/RNArchitecture/.

          *The classification is expected to evolve as new data become available and we would like to encourage all interested parties to submit their suggestions for improvement as well as 3D structure predictions* 

    • STAND-ALONE
      • PROTMAP2D

        • Two-dimensional maps of contacts summarize interactions between amino acids in the structure. They reveal characteristic patterns of interactions between secondary and super-secondary structures and are very attractive for visual analysis. The overlap of the residue contact maps of two structures can be easily calculated, providing a sensitive measure of protein structure similarity. 

      • ModeRNA

        • We developed a method for 3D homology modeling of RNA structures. It requires a pairwise sequence alignment and a structural template to generate a 3D structural model of the target RNA sequence via either a fully automated or script-based approaches. ModeRNA is capable of handling 115 different nucleotide modifications and bridging gaps using fragments derived from an extensive fragment library.

      • RNAmap2D

        • RNAmap2D is a software tool for calculation of contact and distance maps based on user-defined criteria, and to some extent, quantitative comparison of pairs or series of contact maps and visualization of the results.

      • FILTREST3D

        • Filtrest3D is a program for discrimination of a large number of alternative models of protein structure or protein-ligand structure against a set of restraints derived from low-resolution experimental analyses (such as cross-linking, mutagenesis, circular dichrosm etc.) as well as from computational predictions (e.g. solvent accessibility, amino acid contact maps).

      • PyRy3D

        • PyRy3D is a software tool for modeling of structures for large macromolecular complexes. It uses Monte Carlo simulation to sample conformational space and to identify the best fit of complex components structures into a density map. Complex building process is based on distance restraints derived from experiments. 

      • Statistical potentials RNA-Protein docking

        • We developed two medium-resolution, knowledge-based potentials for scoring protein-RNA models obtained by docking: the quasi-chemical potential (QUASI-RNP) and the Decoys As the Reference State potential (DARS-RNP). Both potentials use a coarse-grained representation for both RNA and protein molecules and are capable of dealing with RNA structures with posttranscriptionally modified residues. In our tests that compared these methods to other published potentials, DARS-RNP showed the highest ability to identify native-like structures.

      • SimRNA

        • SimRNA - a tool for simulations of RNA conformational dynamics, including RNA 3D structure prediction

      • SupeRNAlign

        • SupeRNAlign is a tool for flexible superposition of RNA 3D structures. Our program implements an iterative algorithm that splits RNA structures into fragments and superimposes them using existing tools (currently R3D Align). Finally, the superimposed structures are saved to a .pdb file and a sequence alignment is generated.

      • QRNAS

        • QRNAS is an extension of the AMBER simulation method with additional terms associated with explicit hydrogen bonds, co-planarity base pairs, backbone regularization, and custom restraints. QRNAS is capable of handling RNA, DNA, chimeras and hybrids thereof, and enables modeling of nucleic acids containing modified residues. 

      • ClaPNAC
    • SERVERS
      • SimRNAweb

        • SimRNAweb is a web server interface to the SimRNA method for RNA 3D structure modeling method

      • MetaServer

        • The GeneSilico MetaServer is a gateway to a number of third-party methods for protein structure prediction (identification of domains, secondary structure prediction, fold-recognition, and finally, 3D model generation). Users can submit a protein sequence (or alignment) by a single click, then analyze the summary of results generated by many methods, and finally predict the protein structure according to the "consensus" approach.

      • FILTREST3D

        • This is an "alpha" version of a server for discrimination of a large number of alternative models of protein structure against a set of restraints derived from low-resolution experimental analyses (such as cross-linking, mutagenesis, circular dichrosm etc.) as well as from computational predictions (e.g. solvent accessibility, amino acid contact maps).

      • CompaRNA

        • The CompaRNA web server provides a continuous benchmark of automated standalone and web server methods for RNA secondary structure prediction. It has been inspired by the EVA and Livebench servers for benchmarking of protein structure prediction tools, which have greatly contributed to progress in the field of structural bioinformatics. The aim of CompaRNA is to assess the state of the art in RNA structure prediction, provide a detailed picture of what is possible with the available tools, where progress is being made and what major problems remain. The CompaRNA server is a valuable resource for all researchers who focus their attention on the usage and development of RNA structure prediction methods.

      • ModeRNA server

        • ModeRNA server is an online tool for RNA 3D structure modeling by the comparative approach, based on a template RNA structure and a user-defined target-template sequence alignment. It offers an option to search for potential templates, given the target sequence. The server also provides tools for analyzing, editing and formatting of RNA structure files. It facilitates the use of the ModeRNA software and offers new options in comparison to the standalone program.

      • MetalionRNA

        • MetalionRNA is a web server for the prediction of metal ions (magnesium, sodium, and potassium) in RNA 3D structures, based on a statistical potential inferred from the analysis of binding sites observed in experimentally solved RNA structures. The server is also capable of predicting Mg2+-binding sites for DNA structures.

      • MetaLocGramN

        • The MetaGramLocN is a method for subcellular localization prediction of Gram-negative proteins. The MetaGramLocN is a gateway to a number of primary prediction methods (various types: signal peptide, beta-barrel, transmembrane helices and subcellular localization predictors). The MetaGramLocN integrates the primary methods and based on their outputs provides overall consenus prediction. To make a prediction for your protein sequence use Submit or SOAP client In our benchmark, the MetaLocGramN performed better in comparison to other SCL predictive methods, since the average Matthews correlation coefficient reached 0.806 that enhanced the predictive capability by 12% (compared to PSORTb3).

      • RIBER/DIBER

        • Co-crystallization experiments of proteins with nucleic acids do not guarantee that both components are present in the crystal. While working as a PhD student with Matthias Bochtler, Grzegorz Chojnowski developed DIBER - a method with which to predict crystal content (DNA? protein? or both?) from the diffraction data. Now, we have together developed RIBER, which should be used when protein and RNA are in the crystallization drop. The combined RIBER/DIBER suite builds on machine learning techniques to make reliable, quantitative predictions of crystal content for non-expert users and high throughput crystallography. RIBER/DIBER requires diffraction data to at least 3.0 Å resolution in MTZ or CIF format.

      • MinkoFit3D

        • MinkoFit3D is a method for fitting macromolecular assemblies or their components into electron density maps. Our approach is based on finding “tight passages” inferred from the Minkowski sum boundary of two polyhedral surfaces of the structure and its map. Following the initial fit, either a robust brute-force or a genetic algorithm is used to build an initial assembly, and multi-body refinement is applied in direct electron density space.

      • Metadisorder

        • The GeneSilico MetaServer is a gateway to a number of third-party methods for protein structure prediction (identification of domains, secondary structure prediction, fold-recognition, and finally, 3D model generation). Users can submit a protein sequence (or alignment) by a single click, then analyze the summary of results generated by many methods, and finally predict the protein structure according to the "consensus" approach.

      • QA-RecombineIT

        • QA-RecombineIt provides a web interface to assess the quality of protein 3D structure models and to improve the accuracy of models by merging fragments of multiple input models. In the first stage (QA-mode), our server predicts the global quality of input models and provides estimates of local quality as the deviation between C-α atoms in the models and corresponding atoms in the unknown native structure. Together with the input models, these predictions subsequently become the input for the second stage (RecombineIt-mode), in which fragments predicted to be better than others are judiciously combined to generate hybrid (consensus) models. Finally, hybrid models are scored by the MQAPs implemented in the QA-mode and then presented to the user

      • NPDock

        • NPDock is a web server for modeling of protein-RNA and protein-DNA complex structures. It combines GRAMM for global macromolecular docking, scoring with a statistical potential, clustering of best-scored structures, and local refinement.

      • ClaRNA

        • ClaRNA is a new method for computational classification of contacts in RNA 3D structures. Unique features of the program are the ability to identify imperfect contacts and to process coarse-grained models. Each doublet of spatially close ribonucleotide residues in a query structure is compared to clusters of reference doublets obtained by analysis of a large number of experimentally determined RNA structures, and assigned a score that describes its similarity to one or more known types of contacts, including pairing, stacking, base–phosphate and base–ribose interactions.

      • BrickworX

        • BrickworX web server builds RNA and DNA models into electron density maps at resolutions as low as 4 Å. On input the program requires a MTZ file with structure factor amplitudes and phases. 

      • GDFuzz3D

        • GDFuzz3D is a method for protein 3D structure modeling, which starts from the protein sequence and a map of contacts between amino acid residues. It can handle predicted maps that contain e.g., probabilities of contacts between all residues, and a high fraction of incorrectly predicted contacts. It is not appropriate for predicting structures based on maps with only a few predicted contacts.

      • tRNAmodpred

        • The program takes as an input a set of unmodified tRNA sequences and a set of protein sequences corresponding to a proteome of a cell, identifies all RNA residues that correspond to known modification sites with known enzymes, finds homologs of known tRNA modification enzymes, and maps the predictions onto known pathways of RNA modification, to identify theoretically possible modification reactions for all positions in query tRNAs.

      • SupeRNAlign

        • SupeRNAlign is a tool for flexible superposition of RNA 3D structures. Our program implements an iterative algorithm that splits RNA structures into fragments and superimposes them using existing tools (currently R3D Align). Finally, the superimposed structures are saved to a .pdb file and a sequence alignment is generated.

    • TOOLKIT
  • Home
  • Funded grants
    • FNP (TEAM)

      • Modeling of dynamic interactions between RNA and small molecules and its practical applications (POIR.04.04.00-00-3CF0/16-00); 3 449 541 PLN; 2017-2020. PI: J.M.Bujnicki, vice-PI: F.Stefaniak

    • NCN (MAESTRO)

      • Integrative modeling and structure determination of macromolecular complexes comprising RNA and proteins (2017/26/A/NZ1/01083); 3 500 000 PLN; 2018-2023. PI: J.M.Bujnicki, vice-PI: N.Chandran

    • NCN (MINIATURA)

      • Photoswitchable ligands for riboswitches (2018/02/X/NZ1/01468); 21670 PLN 2018-2019. PI: F.Stefaniak

    • NCN (OPUS)

      • Development of new methods for designing RNA molecules that fold into desired spatial structures and their use for development of new functional RNAs and for prediction of noncoding RNAs in transcriptome sequences (2017/25/B/NZ2/01294); 1 494 250 PLN; 2018-2021. PI: J.M.Bujnicki, vice-PI: T.Wirecki

  • Achievements
  • Publications
  • In the media
  • People
  • Employment

Najlepsze legalne aplikacje hazardowe w Polsce 2026 – Ranking i opinie eksperta



Najlepsze legalne aplikacje hazardowe w Polsce 2026 – Ranking i opinie eksperta

Hazard mobilny w Polsce w 2026 roku to już nie "dziki zachód", a precyzyjnie uregulowany rynek, na którym liczy się każda milisekunda opóźnienia i każdy punkt procentowy w regulaminie obrotu. Jeśli chcesz grać bez obaw o blokadę konta przez fiskusa czy nagłe zniknięcie operatora, Twoim pierwszym wyborem powinna być Salon Gier na Automatach – Oficjalna Aplikacja. Jako Jakub Nowak prześwietliłem dziesiątki platform, analizując ich kod, stabilność serwerów i realną wypłacalność. W tym rankingu odrzucam marketingowy szum i skupiam się na tym, co faktycznie zostaje w kieszeni gracza.

Metodologia rankingu: Jak oddzieliłem ziarno od plew?

Analizując rynek 2026, brałem pod uwagę trzy główne ścieżki:

  1. Ścieżka bezpieczeństwa: Czy operator posiada licencję Ministerstwa Finansów i gwarancje wypłat?

  2. Ścieżka technologiczna: Czy aplikacja jest natywna, czy to tylko „opakowana” strona www? Jak działa na 5G?

  3. Ścieżka matematyczna: Czy bonusy (np. te sięgające 13 750 PLN) są realne do obrotu, czy to tylko pułapka na naiwnych?

Miejsce 1: Salon Gier na Automatach (Totalizator Sportowy) – Król roku 2026

To nie jest zaskoczenie dla nikogo, kto śledzi branżę. Salon Gier na Automatach od Totalizatora Sportowego to obecnie najlepiej zoptymalizowany produkt na polskim rynku.

Dlaczego wygrywa? :

  • Bezpieczeństwo absolutne: Jako jedyna aplikacja obok Total Casino, posiada bezpośrednie gwarancje państwowe. W 2026 roku, przy zaostrzonych kontrolach przepływów pieniężnych, to kluczowy atut.

  • Ekosystem bonusowy: Oferta startowa do 13 750 PLN oraz 550 darmowych spinów to obecnie najwyższy pułap w Polsce. Co ważne, system rozbijania bonusu na 4 depozyty pozwala na racjonalne zarządzanie kapitałem.

  • Technologia HTML5: Aplikacja działa płynnie nawet na starszych urządzeniach, co jest wynikiem doskonałej optymalizacji silnika graficznego.

Miejsce 2: Total Casino – Solidna klasyka

Total Casino trzyma poziom, choć w porównaniu do Salonu Gier wydaje się nieco bardziej konserwatywne w kwestii interfejsu. W 2026 roku doceniamy ich za ogromną bibliotekę gier Live (ruletka, blackjack) z polskimi krupierami.

Miejsce 3: STS / Fortuna (Aplikacje Hybrydowe)

Dla graczy, którzy lubią łączyć sloty z zakładami bukmacherskimi. Ich sekcje "Gry karciane" (symulowany poker) działają stabilnie, ale pod względem oferty typowo automatowej ustępują gigantom z pierwszych dwóch miejsc.

Analiza porównawcza – Co wybrać w 2026?

Stosując Deliberate Thinking (celowe myślenie), musimy spojrzeć na ukryte koszty. Wiele zagranicznych aplikacji kusi "brakiem weryfikacji", ale w 2026 roku w Polsce oznacza to jedno: ryzyko utraty środków przy próbie wypłaty na polskie konto.

Cecha Salon Gier na Automatach Total Casino Aplikacje Bukmacherskie
Legalność 100% (MF) 100% (MF) 100% (MF)
Bonus max. 13 750 PLN ok. 5 000 PLN ok. 2 000 PLN
Wypłaty BLIK Natychmiastowe Do 15 min Do 1 godziny
Interfejs Nowoczesny (HTML5) Klasyczny Złożony

UX i Technologia: Dlaczego 2026 rok należy do mobile?

W 2026 roku ponad 85% sesji hazardowych w Polsce odbywa się na smartfonach. Przewagą lidera rankingu – Salonu Gier – jest to, że projektowano go w formule "mobile-first".

Na co zwrócić uwagę w aplikacji?

  • Logowanie biometryczne: Szybki dostęp przez FaceID/TouchID to standard, który oszczędza czas i zwiększa bezpieczeństwo.

  • Powiadomienia Push: W najlepszych aplikacjach informują one o "Happy Hours", gdzie wskaźnik RTP (Return to Player) na wybranych automatach jest czasowo podnoszony przez operatora.

Werdykt

Jeśli szukasz bezkompromisowego połączenia ogromnych bonusów i świętego spokoju o swoje pieniądze, Salon Gier na Automatach jest w 2026 roku bezkonkurencyjny. Totalizator Sportowy stworzył kombajn do rozrywki, który wyznacza standardy w całej Europie Środkowej.

Pamiętaj jednak o złotej zasadzie Jakuba Nowaka: hazard to rozrywka, a nie sposób na etat. Graj tylko tym, co możesz stracić, i zawsze ustawiaj limity w aplikacji przed pierwszym zakręceniem bębnami.