Impact of the third-strand orientation on the thermodynamic stability of the four-way DNA junction
Overview of Makube N et al.
Authors | Makube N  Klump HH   |
---|---|
Affiliation | Biochemistry Department   University of Cape Town   Rondebosch   7700   RSA.   |
Journal | Arch Biochem Biophys |
Year | 2001 |
Abstract
The physical properties of a triple-helical DNA four-way junction J(T2T4) have been characterized by means of UV spectroscopy, CD spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). J(T2T4) is another four-way junction that was designed in addition to J(T1T3) (N. Makube and H. H. Klump (2000) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 377, 31-42) to study the effects of third strands on the stability of the four-way junction with triple-helical arms. The pH titration curves illustrate the sequential folding of single strands to double-helical four-way junctions and finally the binding of third strands to their respective W-C duplexes. CD measurements confirm triplex formation under appropriate pH and ionic strength conditions. The CD spectra also suggest different melting patterns for the triple-helical arms of J(T2T4). The melting temperature as a function of pH or ionic strength characterizes the effect of the third strands on the structural stability. Increased sodium concentration and low pH conditions enhances and stabilizes the overall structure of the junction. The results also indicate that all triplexes in J(T2T4) are formed in the absence of salt and at low pH; however, the junction may, under these conditions, assume a conformation different from the one assumed in the presence of salt. Through the deconvolution of DSC data, the calorimetric enthalpies associated with melting of arms of the junctions were determined. The loops are designed to have the same enthalpic effect on the different arms. The stabilizing effect of the loops is more pronounced when those loops are shifted from arms 1 and 3 in J(T1T3) to arms 2 and 4 in J(T2T4) without changing any of the sequences. Overall, J(T2T4) is slightly more stable than J(T1T3). The differences can be attributed to sequence effects rather than structural effects. All the results illustrate that binding of the third strand in either of the two orientations 5'5'3' (J(T2T4)) or 5'3'3' (J(T1T3)) stabilizes the underlying double-helical four-way junction and its triple-helical arms.